Содержание
- 2. The Comintern: Institutions and people Dr Nikolaos Papadatos, University of Geneva Global Studies Institute Email: nikolaos.papadatos@unige.ch
- 3. INDEX 1 Nikos Zachariadis and the Komintern 2 Nikos Zachariadis after the liberation 3 Greek communists
- 6. Nikos Zachariadis and the Komintern The start of the Second World War, the triple occupation of
- 7. With the help of Thanassis Claras (Aris Velouchiotis) he escaped from prison and, at after a
- 8. The "Comintern's appeal" in November 1931 constituted the beginning of the "Bolshevization" process of the KKE.
- 9. International capital flows have narrowed considerably, and a number of countries (Great Britain, Austria, Germany, Czechoslovakia,
- 10. On this issue a strong confrontation within the leadership of the KKE arose. One side of
- 11. During their stay in Moscow in June 1931, the Comintern leadership criticized the party's action. Valetsky
- 12. Comrades, I will not talk about numbers, I will not quote events that all Greek comrades
- 13. About the party’s tasks. I believe that the Communist International's decision gives to the party the
- 14. The organizational strengthening of the party is crucial, the creation of an elementary party mechanism, the
- 15. We need to define this work, we must help the communist youth with all our means
- 16. Then, one of the leaders of the International Leninist School of Moscow, a member of the
- 17. The latest principles expressed by Kolarov were directly related to the nomination of Nikos Zachariadis as
- 18. Valetsky, Kolarov, and Panov, considering the progress of studies of Nikos Zachariadis at the International Leninist
- 19. Foreign policy of the USSR towards Greece: 1944-1949 The December riots in Athens and the geopolitical
- 21. Urgent (white sea and Athens) 15.12.1944: Roussos left a few days ago. Grandfather advises to continue
- 26. After the defeat on Grammos, the Greek communists were divided into two main groups: the civilian
- 31. The bloody events that took place on the night of 10 to 11 September 1955 in
- 32. Giatroudakis: “It has been said unofficially that Stalin wanted the Greek civil war in order to
- 33. According to D. Seveliaguine and Mantcha, members of the International Department of the CC of the
- 34. Thomas Dritsios, a member of the Tashkent community, states: “The climate conditions of Central Asia, completely
- 35. By the end of 1954 the Soviets tended to oppose any power and decision of the
- 36. Papaioannou, another protagonist of the same period said: “I repeat: the split of the Greek communists
- 38. Panos Dimitriou says: “The anti-Stalinist followers of Khrushchev's group were sympathetic to the struggle against Zachariadis
- 39. Their significant report stated : “We tried to put in the right way the group of
- 40. The fight between Panos Dimitriou and Nikos Zachariadis and the Soviet position. The newspaper “for the
- 41. The following note, sent to the headquarters of KKE in Romania, summed up the animosity between
- 42. Vlantas: “No, comrades. Anyone who criticizes our “governing bodies” in Tashkent does not criticize the CPSU.
- 43. The Presidium of the CPSU and in particular, A.I. Mikoyan, Voroshilov, Molotov, Saburov, Suslov, published the
- 44. François Fejtö writes: “The cultural differences between the Communist Parties of the People’s democracies came to
- 45. In particular, The Komarov Committee emphasized the following words of Zachariadis: “At the Executive Conference and
- 46. The creation of an International Committee made up of representatives of six “brother parties”, following the
- 47. After these accusations, Zachariadis declared on February 21, 1956: “In 1947, at the June meeting, at
- 48. The International Committee tried to legitimize the ouster of Zachariadis through an “institutional” way, via legal
- 49. To the Government of the USSR, the Prosecutor's Office and Attorney General Руденко, (Рома́н Андре́евич Руде́нко)
- 50. In the same report of the delegation, we find this information: “Four Secretaries of the Party’s
- 51. The non-recognition of the Party Committee in Tashkent. The end of the organizations of the Greek
- 52. From 1956 to early June 1962 Zachariadis worked as director of "Lesprom" - a state enterprise
- 53. To the newspaper "Avgi" Mr. Director, Please publish my letter below. On February 1, 1962, I
- 54. They know how to slander, defame and dirty the popular movement. But when they have the
- 55. When I saw how the government and the whole reaction were dealing with my request, I
- 58. Nikos Zachariadis: letter from Сургут to the members of KKE The love, respect, and deep appreciation
- 59. To the Government of the USSR, the Prosecutor's Office and Attorney General Руденко, (Рома́н Андре́евич Руде́нко)
- 60. We ask you: when will you answer our questions? Until when will the doors be closed
- 61. Nothing is solved by violence. You proclaim it yourself, a thousand times, through television, radio and
- 63. Скачать презентацию
Слайд 2The Comintern: Institutions and people
Dr Nikolaos Papadatos, University of Geneva
Global Studies Institute
Email: nikolaos.papadatos@unige.ch
The Comintern: Institutions and people
Dr Nikolaos Papadatos, University of Geneva
Global Studies Institute
Email: nikolaos.papadatos@unige.ch
Слайд 3INDEX
1 Nikos Zachariadis and the Komintern
2 Nikos Zachariadis after the liberation
3 Greek communists
INDEX
1 Nikos Zachariadis and the Komintern
2 Nikos Zachariadis after the liberation
3 Greek communists
4 Zachariadis and his supporters: The facts
5 Testimonials of the protagonists
6 The hidden soviet agenda against Zachariadis
7 Soviet intervention in the Tashkent community
8 The method of Soviet’s intervention
9 The struggle between Zachariadis and the Kremlin’s protégés
10 The decision of the CPSU
11 Zachariadis and the CPSU: The historical context
12 Soviet interference in the KKE
13 The split of the Tashkent community
14 The main aspects of the split of the Tashkent Community
15 Zachariadis and his last fight
16 Nikos Zachariadis: letter from Сургут to the members of KKE
17 The Leninist Marxist Organization of Tashkent
Слайд 6Nikos Zachariadis and the Komintern
The start of the Second World War, the triple
Nikos Zachariadis and the Komintern
The start of the Second World War, the triple
Слайд 7With the help of Thanassis Claras (Aris Velouchiotis) he escaped from prison and,
Слайд 8The "Comintern's appeal" in November 1931 constituted the beginning of the "Bolshevization" process
The "Comintern's appeal" in November 1931 constituted the beginning of the "Bolshevization" process
The pole Maksymilian Henryk Horwitz, (Максимилиа́н Ге́нрик Хо́рвиц), with the Soviet pseudonym Вале́цкий , was a member of the Polish Communist Party. In 1925 he joined the Executive Committee of the Comintern and in the same year he joined the ВКП (б). He was, among other things, responsible for the Greek communist party. The crisis of the KKE leadership in 1929-1931 coincides with the global economic recession of that period. In the early 1920s, the Soviet economist Никола́й Дми́триевич Кондра́тьев had predicted the downward trend of the global capitalist economy. The extent of the crisis of the late 1920s confirmed this assessment. The collapse of the New York Stock Exchange on 29 October 1929 was the detonator of the global economic depression.
Слайд 9International capital flows have narrowed considerably, and a number of countries (Great Britain,
Слайд 10On this issue a strong confrontation within the leadership of the KKE arose.
On this issue a strong confrontation within the leadership of the KKE arose.
However, the Comintern apparatus was not only interested in the class struggle in Greece. The main objective was the unconditional alignment of the Greek communist with the general political objectives of the Comintern. This fact also contributed to the famous escape of the following Communists from the prison of Syggrou in April 1931: Lefteris Apostolou, Andronikos Haitas, Costas Efthyiadis, Orpheas Economidis, Vasilis Asikis, Markos Markovitis, Dimitris Paparigas, Periklis Karaskoyias and Grigoris Grigoriadis. They then went to Moscow together with Giorgos Siantos, Giorgos Kolozov and Giorgos Douvas.
Слайд 11During their stay in Moscow in June 1931, the Comintern leadership criticized the
During their stay in Moscow in June 1931, the Comintern leadership criticized the
“First of all, in my opinion there is no doubt that all the speakers here, the Greek comrades of the leadership, do not fully understand the tragic situation of the party. There is a certain tone in all the speeches that they made some mistakes, that "we do not deny that such mistakes have been made before us and that they will happen after us in Greece and other countries". "The Communist International corrects our mistakes, and therefore we will not go against the Comintern." Nothing special happened, especially within the Greek party, we know that such mistakes have been made in the past. I think this mentality has to be crushed. What was happened belongs to the worst (tradition) of the history of the Comintern and of the Greek party. The comrades are thinking: "we are living in Greece all these recent years with some hesitation, but in general (there is) the most serious economic crisis and the difficult situation of our class enemies, the increase of the labor movement, the increase of the struggles of workers and farmers". And, at this point the Party is not just stagnant, it does not stay behind, but it is in a state of collapse.
Слайд 12Comrades, I will not talk about numbers, I will not quote events that
Comrades, I will not talk about numbers, I will not quote events that
During these conversations in Moscow between the leadership of the KKE and the Balkan Secretariat of the Executive Committee of the Comintern, Valetsky vigorously condemned the "fight without principles" of the Politburo and the CC of the KKE. In the same debate, in June 1931, shortly before his formal appointment to the Greek Party Secretariat, Nikos Zachariades stated the following before the Balkan Secretariat of the Executive Committee of the Comintern :
Слайд 13About the party’s tasks. I believe that the Communist International's decision gives to
About the party’s tasks. I believe that the Communist International's decision gives to
Слайд 14The organizational strengthening of the party is crucial, the creation of an elementary
The organizational strengthening of the party is crucial, the creation of an elementary
We must specifically address the issue of eliminating the influence of social-fascism and agrarian-fascism on the working environment. The Greek party with proper political direction and proper organizational work has all the objective capabilities to carry out this task as soon as possible. We must focus on anti-war work in Greece, where there are great objective conditions for this job. We have this spontaneous movement there, and Communist youth is doing this job without the help of the party.
Слайд 15We need to define this work, we must help the communist youth with
We need to define this work, we must help the communist youth with
Bela Kun, one of the leaders of the Balkan section of the Comintern, attended the meeting and just after Zachariadis’ speech stated the following:
“The Communist International will take a decision and will create such an instrument that will guide the implementation of this decision in Greece. I think that this body must be set up by comrades who are now working in Greece, by workers who are now leading the organizations and who have in fact shown that they can really develop the party. In addition, all forces of КУНМЗ and МЛШ must be assembled in Greece for direct work in order to conduct the implementation of this decision on the ground”.
Слайд 16Then, one of the leaders of the International Leninist School of Moscow, a
Then, one of the leaders of the International Leninist School of Moscow, a
And he concluded with the following words:
“It is time, comrades, to raise the question of discipline. There is no discipline in the Greek party. In my view, the essential thing now ... is to stop, eradicate, completely eradicate every factionalist psychology. Then we can really deal with the facts with dignity”.
The final blow to the KKE’s “factional” deviations was given by Kolarov:
“… The Greek Party is suffering by the strong influence of petty bourgeois intellectuals who are at the moment in the leadership, and therefore we can see in every decision the survival of a revolutionary phraseology under which the right and left opportunist practices are covered. The Greek party, due to this fact, was removed from the masses, from the workers, from the peasants. Due to the strengthening of this gap in the last period, the position of fascists, farmers, social-fascists and all other petty bourgeois parties is strengthened. In this field there is loss of influence, loss of the organizational discipline of the party. On this ground was implemented the factional struggle” ...
Слайд 17The latest principles expressed by Kolarov were directly related to the nomination of
The latest principles expressed by Kolarov were directly related to the nomination of
“I now propose the establishment of a committee which, on the basis of the exchange of views, will consist of the following comrades: Valetsky, Kolarov and Panov”.
Слайд 18Valetsky, Kolarov, and Panov, considering the progress of studies of Nikos Zachariadis at
Valetsky, Kolarov, and Panov, considering the progress of studies of Nikos Zachariadis at
Слайд 19 Foreign policy of the USSR towards Greece: 1944-1949
The December riots in Athens and
Foreign policy of the USSR towards Greece: 1944-1949
The December riots in Athens and
The new Bulgarian data and the comparison of Russian and Bulgarian sources.
The Greek communists in the context of the cold war: the case of the Tashkent communists.
Nikos Zachariadis after the liberation
Слайд 21Urgent (white sea and Athens)
15.12.1944:
Roussos left a few days ago.
Grandfather advises
15.12.1944:
Roussos left a few days ago.
Grandfather advises
to continue the fight.
We do our best.
Bulgarian State Archive:
TsPA / 1/7/199
Слайд 26After the defeat on Grammos, the Greek communists were divided into two main
Greek communists in Tashkent
Слайд 31The bloody events that took place on the night of 10 to 11
The bloody events that took place on the night of 10 to 11
The rejection of the KKE program project by the Soviets in 1954.
Dezhacariadization and destalinization: The arrest of Beria, the Rioumine and Abakumov affair, Djafar Bagirov etc.
The Greek civil war, the experience of forced expatriation of the partisans and their families, the hardships endured by Greek refugees during the first years of their settlement on Soviet soil may partly explain the split of this community .
Zachariadis and his supporters: The facts
Слайд 32Giatroudakis: “It has been said unofficially that Stalin wanted the Greek civil war
Giatroudakis: “It has been said unofficially that Stalin wanted the Greek civil war
Dimitriou: “The civil war has had an impact on our mental attitude. It was a trauma that left deep roots in our psychology and the formation of our ideas was influenced by this reality”.
Testimonials of the protagonists
Слайд 33According to D. Seveliaguine and Mantcha, members of the International Department of the
According to D. Seveliaguine and Mantcha, members of the International Department of the
“The direction of the Greek Communists is by a Party Committee, which is elected by a Conference. Daily political action is led by the Bureau of the Party Organization (9 persons) and the Secretariat (3 persons). Political refugees are publishing their own newspaper in Greek and in Slavo-Macedonian”.
An additional problem: the relations of Nikos Zachariadis with Tito and the relations of the USSR with Yugoslavia.
The organization of the Greek communists in Tashkent
Слайд 34Thomas Dritsios, a member of the Tashkent community, states: “The climate conditions of
Thomas Dritsios, a member of the Tashkent community, states: “The climate conditions of
However, why the Greek partisans were transferred to Tashkent?
Soviet authorities wanted, at the beginning, to have an additional military reserve which could have contributed to the safeguarding of the People's democracies, to the protection of the USSR's borders in order to counterbalance the Western pressures.
Gradually, this policy changed, especially after Stalin’s death: the Greek communists were advised and then forced to accept the new “Marxist principles”.
Слайд 35By the end of 1954 the Soviets tended to oppose any power and
By the end of 1954 the Soviets tended to oppose any power and
The objective was obviously to limit the responsibility of the KKE Secretary-General in a crisis situation.
In 1954, the KKE's BP received information about a defamatory campaign Implemented by some of the guarded soldiers of the Democratic Army disrupting communist values.
Kitsikopoulos’case, a pro-Zachariadian Party member, revealed that “the Soviets had offered him a job ... when he was secretary of the KKE’s Organization in Tashkent in order to replace the KKE leadership ... controlled by Zachariadis by another”. (Testimony of Zygouras Palaiologos, former cadre of KKE).
The hidden soviet agenda against Zachariadis
Слайд 36Papaioannou, another protagonist of the same period said: “I repeat: the split of
Papaioannou, another protagonist of the same period said: “I repeat: the split of
Слайд 38Panos Dimitriou says: “The anti-Stalinist followers of Khrushchev's group were sympathetic to the
Panos Dimitriou says: “The anti-Stalinist followers of Khrushchev's group were sympathetic to the
The Soviets meticulously prepared the political end of Nikos Zachariadis and his entourage.
A mission composed by the previous Generals of the Democratic Army, Fokas and Vaϊnas tried to collect detailed information with regards to the Tashkent’s opposition and send their reports to Bucharest where was based the leadership of the Greek Party after the end of the Greek civil war.
Soviet intervention in the Tashkent community
Слайд 39Their significant report stated :
“We tried to put in the right way
Their significant report stated :
“We tried to put in the right way
Слайд 40The fight between Panos Dimitriou and Nikos Zachariadis and the Soviet position.
The newspaper
The fight between Panos Dimitriou and Nikos Zachariadis and the Soviet position.
The newspaper
During September 1955, the Soviet Committee composed by Komarov, Gromov, Rumyantsev, Vinogradov and Novikov stated: “Comrade Zachariadis ... defends the following idea, Dimitriou’s position about the defeat of the second revolution in Greece is a revisionist one [...] because it identifies the causes of the defeat of the two revolutions by reducing to the same degree the arguments and the motives that led to this defeat”.
The method of Soviet’s intervention
Слайд 41The following note, sent to the headquarters of KKE in Romania, summed up
The following note, sent to the headquarters of KKE in Romania, summed up
Collection of letters, notes and reports against the KKE Stalinist leadership were sent to the Presidium of the USSR.
A problem between KKE’s leadership and the new leadership of the CPSU was presented as an internal (political, theoretical, etc.) problem of the Greek Communists based in Tashkent.
The new Soviet approach: the method of “communist petitions”.
Слайд 42Vlantas: “No, comrades. Anyone who criticizes our “governing bodies” in Tashkent does not
Who is the real representative of the CPSU: the main question that referred to the recent history of the KKE.
The dismissal of representatives of the Tashkent Conference (the Fourkiotis affair).
The struggle between Zachariadis and the Kremlin’s “protégés”
Слайд 43The Presidium of the CPSU and in particular, A.I. Mikoyan, Voroshilov, Molotov, Saburov,
The Presidium of the CPSU and in particular, A.I. Mikoyan, Voroshilov, Molotov, Saburov,
“Given the numerous requests and letters of the Greek political refugees received by the CPSU during the period of September-December 1955 ... the CC of the CPSU would advise the CC of the KKE to a) Convene the Plenum of the Organization’s Committee of the KKE in Tashkent, b) Organize the General Assemblies of all the Basic Organizations of the Greek Communists, c) convoke a Conference in Tashkent ... 2. Actively encourage the CC of the Communist Party of Uzbekistan to provide a daily assistance to the organizations of the Greek communists. 3. The CC considers that Comrade Zachariadis can publish the above decision of the CC of the CPSU”.
The decision of the CPSU
Слайд 44François Fejtö writes: “The cultural differences between the Communist Parties of the People’s
Zachariadis and the CPSU: The historical context
Слайд 45In particular, The Komarov Committee emphasized the following words of Zachariadis: “At the
In particular, The Komarov Committee emphasized the following words of Zachariadis: “At the
Слайд 46The creation of an International Committee made up of representatives of six “brother
The creation of an International Committee made up of representatives of six “brother
Karl Afanasievitch Semenkov, Special Attaché of the International Department of the CC of the CPSU who, in 1956, was responsible for the relations between the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the KKE, stated I, 1999 that “the Dej report was written at the headquarters of the CPSU by [... Pyotr Ivanovich Petrov Mantchkha [...]”. (Ethnos, August 30, 1999).
Soviet interference in the KKE
Слайд 47After these accusations, Zachariadis declared on February 21, 1956: “In 1947, at the
After these accusations, Zachariadis declared on February 21, 1956: “In 1947, at the
The International Committee declared that the reopening of hostilities by the KKE in 1946-1947 was “an adventurism”. This thesis was categorically refused by Zachariadis.
This International Committee revived the activity of the former “anti-Party” cadres (a internal conflict related to the Stalin-Tito split, struggle between Marcos Vafiadis and Zachariadis).
Слайд 48The International Committee tried to legitimize the ouster of Zachariadis through an “institutional”
The International Committee tried to legitimize the ouster of Zachariadis through an “institutional”
Zachariadis was officially sacked by the KKE during the 7th enlarged Plenum of 1957. At the same time a process of reeducation started, the new leadership proceeded to the withdrawal of previous “sacred” books, as for example the book of Zachariadis: “Nikos ZACHARIADIS, J.V. STALIN, the Master and the guide, the comrade and the friend (speech delivered on December 12, 1949 ... in Greece, editions of KKE CC.) - RGANI, 5/28/419, ff, 305, 306, 307.
Слайд 49To the Government of the USSR, the Prosecutor's Office and Attorney General Руденко,
To the Government of the USSR, the Prosecutor's Office and Attorney General Руденко,
From the Marxist-Leninist group, political refugees from Tashkent, March 16, 1972. We sent you a final letter asking for the implementation of the UN resolutions on human rights.
In the Soviet Union, it has always been proclaimed that any citizen has the right to appeal to any higher body for an answer in a short period of time; when we spoke to you, you did not apply this rule. Two months have elapsed, and we have received no response, and in general you have never answered our letters, thus violating your own rules.
The split of the Tashkent community
Слайд 50In the same report of the delegation, we find this information:
“Four Secretaries of
In the same report of the delegation, we find this information:
“Four Secretaries of
Consequently, the new direction of the Party (Koliyannis, Partsalidis, Dimitriou) was not recognized by the majority of the Greek communists residing in Tashkent.
Слайд 51The non-recognition of the Party Committee in Tashkent.
The end of the organizations of
The non-recognition of the Party Committee in Tashkent.
The end of the organizations of
The creation of a series of political groups within the Tashkent community: the “Zachariadians”, the “anti-Zachariadians”, the “marcists”. Splits within the splits.
The split of Zachariadians into two groups: one was in favor of the USSR, the other in favor of China during the period of antagonism between China and the USSR in the 1960s.
The main aspects of the split of the Tashkent Community
Слайд 52From 1956 to early June 1962 Zachariadis worked as director of "Lesprom" -
From 1956 to early June 1962 Zachariadis worked as director of "Lesprom" -
the identity of political refugee,
the freedom to travel within the Soviet Union
and the possibility to go back to Greece.
In August 1973, he put an end to his life.
Zachariadis and his last fight
Слайд 53To the newspaper "Avgi"
Mr. Director,
Please publish my letter below.
On February 1, 1962, I
To the newspaper "Avgi"
Mr. Director,
Please publish my letter below.
On February 1, 1962, I
On April 8, 1962, I got the answer which was categorically negative, they (the Greek authorities) did not even accept my request and they inform me that they will send it back.
Consequently Karamanlis, together with his overseas bosses revealed themselves.
Слайд 54They know how to slander, defame and dirty the popular movement.
But when they
They know how to slander, defame and dirty the popular movement.
But when they
They have no courage to look into the eyes and see the truth.
I protest with all my force against these illegal Government’s actions and I declare that my efforts will persist in order to force Karamanlis and his associates to accept the above fight.
With this opportunity, I want to make clear this: besides the enemies of the people, the enemies of the national identity and independence, besides native and foreign enemies, besides the enemies and opponents of democratic Greece and communism, I have no open issues to sort out with anyone, nor can I have with anyone else.
Слайд 55When I saw how the government and the whole reaction were dealing with
When I saw how the government and the whole reaction were dealing with
Please forgive me for the inconvenience and I thank for the hospitality.
April 10, 1962
With respect,
Nikos Zachariadis
Слайд 58Nikos Zachariadis: letter from Сургут to the members of KKE
The love, respect, and
Nikos Zachariadis: letter from Сургут to the members of KKE
The love, respect, and
As far as I am concerned, this opinion was expressed openly during conferences and meetings. Generally speaking, I also mentioned this to the other parties in early 1948, especially to the representatives of the КПСС and to the Albanian party.
For Stalin, the reality has also forced me to revise to a great extent my appreciation to him.
11.05.1966
Слайд 59To the Government of the USSR, the Prosecutor's Office and Attorney General Руденко,
To the Government of the USSR, the Prosecutor's Office and Attorney General Руденко,
From the Marxist-Leninist group, political refugees from Tashkent, March 16, 1972. We sent you a final letter asking for the implementation of the UN resolutions on human rights.
In the Soviet Union, it has always been proclaimed that any citizen has the right to appeal to any higher body for an answer in a short period of time; when we spoke to you, you did not apply this rule. Two months have elapsed, and we have received no response, and in general you have never answered our letters, thus violating your own rules.
The Leninist Marxist Organization of Tashkent
Слайд 60We ask you: when will you answer our questions? Until when will the
We ask you: when will you answer our questions? Until when will the
We then paid 25 rubles. But you did not do anything. Later, we again 750 signatures of our comrades who asked to go to the People's Republic of China. For once again, you have not answered, or rather, you have probably answered us with an inappropriate measure for the Soviet regime: violence. You responded by exile, prisons and violent means. Since then, you have continued the same tactics. We make petitions, and you, you use all the violent means that you have at your disposal, even the primitive, inhuman and criminal way of принудительное лечение (in Russian in the text) turning us into madmen.
Слайд 61Nothing is solved by violence. You proclaim it yourself, a thousand times, through
Nothing is solved by violence. You proclaim it yourself, a thousand times, through
Free our leader Nikos Zachariadis. Release our comrade Kostas Kyrgiannis who has been dying for three years of tuberculosis, heart disease and its consequences in your prison, in your psychiatric hospital; these problems are the result of the conditions of isolation (seclusion) of our old comrade, the combatant of our country.
Let us go to the People's Republic of China because here we are not welcome. We are waiting for your response as soon as possible. Reply yourself, not through your organs in Tashkent. (Marxist-Leninist group, Tsouvairis, Tatsi ...).
ГАРФ/ 8331/36/1548.