Содержание
- 2. Сокращения, используемые в презентации в рамках обзора рынка чая TBs/tbgs- teabags (чайные пакетики) LS – leaf
- 3. “B” brand: Value for money tea brand Created in 1998 especially for Russian and Ukrainian markets
- 4. Competitors overview Princess Noory Princess Java Princess Kandy Princess Gita Producer ORIMI ORIMI ORIMI ORIMI Price
- 5. Competitors overview May tea Bodrost Golden Bowl Lisma Producer Price segment TA Assortment (ranges) Main slogan
- 6. “B” was rather stable in HY1 2010 despite Economy decline trend. In the end of 2010
- 7. Negative trend was the result of negative trend in both MT and TT. 52% 48% Value
- 8. Tea market development Market growth Market development
- 9. Segment Evolution SOM value
- 10. Tea market development, Sales value & volume, MAT 08 – MAT 10 +5% +5% - Growth
- 11. Tea market development, Sales value & volume, JJ’08 – JJ’10 +33% +20% -3% -1% -5% -6%
- 12. Tea market by price segments In volume sales tea market decline is driven by all the
- 13. Page Tea market by price segments Premium tea holds significantly higher share in Moscow and St.Pete
- 14. Page Tea market by price segments In Hyper/Supermarkets Premium prevails in sales while Economy accounts for
- 15. Page Tea market development: Loose vs TBs At the same time in absolute volume sales all
- 16. Page Tea market development: Loose vs TBs The growth of teabags share comes primarily from the
- 17. Page Tea market development: Loose vs TBs Premium tea prevails in Hyper/Supermarkets and Superettes with slight
- 18. PLACE
- 19. Market vs Economy players split Sales volume, Channels, MAT 08-10 -1% -5% -15% -8% -1% -
- 20. Tea market development : MT vs TT Traditional Trade importance is more or less stable, contributing
- 21. Tea market development : MT vs TT Traditional Trade is still significant for 24 cities and
- 22. Market vs Economy players split Sales volume, Cities, MAT 08-10 +3% - Growth MAT 2010 vs
- 23. Market vs Economy players split Sales volume, City size, MAT 08-10 -3% - Growth MAT 2010
- 24. Market vs Economy players split Volume share, City size, MAT 08-10 “B” has low share of
- 25. Market vs Economy players split Sales volume, Ranges, MAT 08-10 -11% - Growth MAT 2010 vs
- 26. “B” vs Competitors by ranges “B” has quite balanced portfolio, though loose tea is weak Main
- 27. PRICE
- 28. Price comparison “B” vs competitors Pure Black 26 tbgs “B” is in line with strategic pricing
- 29. Price comparison “B” vs competitors Pure Black 50 tbgs, 100tbgs 50 TBs: “B” is OK both
- 30. 100 tbgs development, SOM Value & price per pack “B” PB 100tbs has the highest SOM
- 31. Price comparison “B” vs competitors Loose Pure Black 100 gr “B” Loose 100 gr has the
- 32. Price comparison “B” vs competitors BF, best distributed SKU “B” is in line with Strategic pricing
- 33. Price comparison “B” vs competitors GF 26 TBs, Infusions 20-25 TBs “B” GF is the most
- 34. Price gap in TT vs MT, “B” has much higher price gap in TT vs MT
- 35. Price map: “B” vs Competitors, PB 20-26 tbs SOM volume & price per pack, JJ’10 “B”
- 36. Economy brands price development, JJ’09 vs JJ’10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
- 37. Consumer Value Index Winter 2009/10: (24/08/09 to 14/02/10) Fair value line Good value More resilient Poor
- 38. PROMOTION
- 39. « L » « B » « BB » Greenfield Tea Ahmad May Tea Princess Nuri
- 40. “B” activities, 2008-2010 TV Launches Promo TV support for promo Fairy Tale 2 160 GRPs 7/04-27/04
- 41. “B” advertising overview, 2006-2009 Over time, “B” shows a consistent and advertising platform Last ads underperform
- 42. Brand Communication Analysis 2009, 30 sec Tested from 14/09/09 to 15/11/09 Correct visibility for the new
- 43. Mean score “B” 2.29 Among total sample Russian average 4.01 Brand Communication Analysis 2009, 30 sec
- 44. PostView TV – “B” ‘Teddy Bears’ Mar-Apr 2010, 15 sec Postview full diagnosis tested from 12/04/10
- 45. (P-ve) (A+ve) (A+ve) (P+ve) (P+ve) (P+ve) (P-ve) (P-ve) (A-ve) (A-ve) (A-ve) (A+ve) Total Russia norm Mean
- 46. PostView TV – “B” ‘Velvet’ May 2010, 15 sec Tested from 07/06/10 to 18/07/10 Hot tea
- 47. (P-ve) (A+ve) (A+ve) (P+ve) (P+ve) (P+ve) (P-ve) (P-ve) (A-ve) (A-ve) (A-ve) (A+ve) Total Russia norm Mean
- 48. “B” communication perception “B” Green Campaign Low spontaneous recall No remarkable character Low purchase intent Positive
- 49. Princess Noory promo support 1998 2007 2003 2005 2006 2004 2009 2010 Repositioning after the crisis
- 50. “B” sponsorship (Social Mission) Sponsor jingle 10 sec (“B” brand Video) Branded cups on the table
- 51. Competitors’ sponsorship
- 52. Sponsorship: Princess Noory Who wants to be a millionaire? Channel: Pervy Period: Dec. 2005 – Dec.
- 53. Green Rosaria New Indian Summer Fairy Tale Turn on TV Game « B » – Teddy
- 54. Green Indian Summer Fairy Tale Rosaria New «B» – Teddy Bears «B» – Velvet taste Despite
- 55. 49% 16% 11% Awareness Re-purchase intents Trial 31% 8% 4% “B” new product launch summary Indian
- 56. “B” Pure Black 100tbs promo effect SOM Value In MT promo brings good MS growth to
- 57. “B” 100tbs Bears promo “B” PB 100tbs promo has low WSD in several cities and almost
- 58. PRODUCT
- 59. ABC analysis “B” vs competitors, SOM Value “B”
- 60. Assortment structure “B” vs competitors “B” Pr. Noory Pr. Java Pr. Kandi Pr. Gita Lisma May
- 61. “B” vs competitors PB Loose tea tasting results, Q3 2010 “B” Loose has quite good results
- 62. “B” vs competitors PB TBs tasting results, Q3 2010 “B” TBs is inferior to Princess Noory
- 63. PROPOSITION
- 64. Tea category perception GENERAL CATEGORY BENEFITS Tonic/ exhilarant effect Well quenches one’s thirst Health benefits Unites
- 65. Penetration of Tea and “B” by Group Food Innovators Quality Seekers Penny Grabbers Indifferent to Food
- 66. “B” is interesting for… Dieters try to care about their body, need a small support in
- 67. Food Innovators Price-conscious Dieters “B” target audience, Women 30-55 (most valued ones 30-40), with families (3+
- 68. “B” % Princess Noory % Princess Gita % Base: total sample (600) () - Figures from
- 69. Better quality Taste/perform better Appeal more Different Better value Cost too much Too cheap Poor quality
- 70. Image positioning mapping “B” as a popular Russian tea brand, 2009 Note: “Typical Russian brand” has
- 71. Category drivers of conviction Winter 07/08 Share of endorsement* Relevance through good taste Performance / Emotional
- 72. Base: Total sample (600) - Significantly different versus previous time period “B” Princess Noory Princess Gita
- 73. “B” Semantic Analysis Conversation Tea party Friends/ friendly Family / Relatives Old man House-spirit Home Sincere
- 74. “B” Brand Perception Ipsos, Sep 2009 Well-known brand with a history Strong and original advertising support
- 75. PACKAGE
- 76. Players in PB segment: package comparison “B” Princess Noori May Tea Lisma Princess Kandi Princess Gita
- 77. Players in BF segment: package comparison “B” Princess Noori May Tea Lisma Princess Kandi Princess Gita
- 78. Players in GF segment: package comparison “B” Princess Java May Tea Lisma Golden Bowl Pack Range
- 79. Players in HF segment: package comparison “B” Princess Java May Tea Lisma Golden Bowl Pack Range
- 80. “B” packs are less noticeable on shelf in comparison with key competitors – Pr. Noory andLisma.
- 82. Скачать презентацию