Solving ultimate pit limit problem through graph closure (L-G algorithm) and the fundamental tree algorithm презентация

Содержание

Слайд 2

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Lerchs – Grossmann (Graph closure) 3. Fundamental Tree Algorithm 4. Assignment

Contents

1. Introduction
2. Lerchs – Grossmann (Graph closure)
3. Fundamental Tree Algorithm
4.

Assignment
Слайд 3

Introduction Two ojectives for open pit optimization Design ultimate pit

Introduction

Two ojectives for open pit optimization
Design ultimate pit limits (Moving cone,

LG, Net work flows …. )
Determining an optimal sequence of extracting the mineralized material from the ground (Short-term and Long-term production scheduling).
Lerchs, H., and Grossmann, I. F., 1965. Optimum Design of Open Pit Mines, Canad. Inst. Mining Bull. 58, pp. 47-54.
Salih Ramazan, The new Fundamental Tree Algorithm for production scheduling of open pit mines, European Journal of Operational Research 177 (2007) 1153–1166
Слайд 4

Block model gdg Source: William Hustrulid: Open Pit Mine Planning & Design

Block model

gdg

Source: William Hustrulid: Open Pit Mine Planning & Design


Слайд 5

DEPOSIT REPRESENTATION OREBODY MODEL A set of mining blocks of

DEPOSIT REPRESENTATION OREBODY MODEL

A set of mining blocks of a given

size with block value

BV: Economic Value of a mining block

Слайд 6

DEPOSIT REPRESENTATION OREBODY MODEL Geologic Model, Copper Grades (lb/ton) Economic Model, Value per block ($/ton)

DEPOSIT REPRESENTATION OREBODY MODEL

Geologic Model, Copper Grades (lb/ton)

Economic Model, Value per

block ($/ton)
Слайд 7

Ultimate Pit Limit Problems Moving (Floating) Cone Algorithm Dynamic Programming

Ultimate Pit Limit Problems

Moving (Floating) Cone Algorithm
Dynamic Programming (LG)
Graph

closure (Lerchs-Grossmann, Minimum Cut , Pseudo-flow Algorithm)
Слайд 8

2. Graph closure (LG) The optimal pit outline is the

2. Graph closure (LG)

The optimal pit outline is the 3D pit

outline which, if mined out, would give the maximum value
Must obey the required pit slope constraints
All the ore which at a given time can be mined at a profit will be mined
Nothing can be added to or taken away from the optimal outline which will increase the value without breaking the slope constraints
Слайд 9

Lerchs-Grossman Algorithm Mathematical search technique which works from just two

Lerchs-Grossman Algorithm

Mathematical search technique which works from just two sources of

information:
1. Economic or value block model:
Set of regular rectangular blocks which completely fill the space under consideration for mining
2. A list of relationships between these blocks:
These relationships are known as `arcs'
Слайд 10

Arc Relationships Each arc goes from one block (A) to

Arc Relationships

Each arc goes from one block (A) to a

second block (B) and indicates that, if A is mined, then B must be mined first to uncover A.
The reverse does not hold since B can be mined without disturbing A.
The arcs encapsulate the required pit slopes

A

B

Слайд 11

Lerchs-Grossman Algorithm In 3-D each of the blocks is connected

Lerchs-Grossman Algorithm

In 3-D each of the blocks is connected to

4, 5 or 9 blocks

Blocks are replaced by graph 'nodes'

Слайд 12

DEFINITIONS Directed graph G(X, A) is defined by a set

DEFINITIONS

Directed graph G(X, A) is defined by a set of nodes

X and a set of arcs A. The LG algorithm finds the maximum closure in the graph G (X, A).
X={x1,x2,….,xn} is called the vertices of G
A is the sets of arcs of G
A closure of G is defined as a set of vertices such that if

Graph representation of the orebody model and a closure.

Слайд 13

BASIC TERMINOLOGY Vertex, xi is the value of block i.

BASIC TERMINOLOGY

Vertex, xi is the value of block i.
Arc,

aij=(xi,xj), an arrow drawn from xi to xj.
Positive arc: an arc starting at an ore vertex towards and overlying waste vertex.
Negative arc: an arc from waste vertex to underlying ore vertex.
The vertex that an arc starts is predecessor and the one that the arc ends is successor
Слайд 14

Root is the vertex without predecessor A closure is any

Root is the vertex without predecessor
A closure is any

surface satisfying the slope constraints
An arc which is going away from the root is p-arc(+).
An arc which is going towards the root is m-arc (-).
The mass is the value of all the nodes a p-arc is supporting (going towards), and the value of all the nodes an m-arc is supported by, or leaving behind.
A p-arc is strong if it supports positive mass (ps), weak otherwise (pw).

BASIC TERMINOLOGY

Слайд 15

An m-arc is weak if it is supported by positive

An m-arc is weak if it is supported by positive

mass (mw), strong otherwise (ms).
A path is a subgraph of G consisting of a sequence of nodes and arcs satisfying the property that the terminal node of an arc is the source node for the succeeding arc.
A chain is a sequence of edges in which each edge has one node in common with the succeeding edge.
A cycle is a chain in which the initial & final nodes coincide

BASIC TERMINOLOGY

Слайд 16

Example of LG -3 -4 +6 +9 X0 p-s m-w p-w p-s Root node

Example of LG

-3

-4

+6

+9

X0

p-s

m-w

p-w

p-s

Root node

Слайд 17

Steps of the algorithm (1) -2 -2 -3 -4 +6

Steps of the algorithm (1)

-2

-2

-3

-4

+6

+9

X0

Step 0: Connect all nodes to the

root node and label the arcs

p-w

p-w

p-w

p-w

p-s

p-s

Слайд 18

Steps of the algorithm (2) -2 -3 -3 -4 +6

Steps of the algorithm (2)

-2

-3

-3

-4

+6

+9

X0

Step 1: Connect p-strong arcs to all

other nodes that must be removed to mine this strong node. When this connection is made eliminate the strong node going from this node.

p-w

p-w

p-s

p-w

p-s

p-s

p-w

Step 2: Re-label.

m-w

Слайд 19

Step 3: Normalize the tree. Root (x0) must be common

Step 3: Normalize the tree. Root (x0) must be common to

all strong edges, if not, then:

a. Replace the strong p-edge (xm-xn) with a dummy arc (x0-xn) to prevent unnecessary support
b. Replace the strong m-edge (xq-xr) with a dummy arc (x0-xq) To avoid supporting a positive mass with a negative mass, i.e. prevents over extending the pit.

Step 4: Go to step 1 if there is a node overlying another node connected to the root by a strong arc. Otherwise stop.

Слайд 20

Application of the steps for small orebody model Step 0:

Application of the steps for small orebody model

Step 0:

Слайд 21

Application of the steps … Step 1 and 2:

Application of the steps …

Step 1 and 2:

Слайд 22

Application of the steps … Step 1-2 -1 -2 -1

Application of the steps …

Step 1-2

-1

-2

-1

-2

+4

+5

X0

p-w

p-w

p-s

p-s

x2

x1

x3

x4

x5

x6

p-w

arc (x0-x2)=-1 -2 + 4 =

+1 ? p-s

m-w

Слайд 23

Application of the steps … Step 1-2 -1 -2 -1

Application of the steps …

Step 1-2

-1

-2

-1

-2

+4

+5

X0

mw

p-w

p-s

x2

x1

x3

x4

x5

x6

p-w

arc (x2-x5)= 4 -1-2 = +1

? pw
arc (x0-x2)= 4 -1-2 + 5 -1 = +5 ? pw

mw

pw

Слайд 24

Application of the steps … Step 1-2 arc (x0-x2)= 4

Application of the steps …

Step 1-2

arc (x0-x2)= 4 -1-2 + 5

-1-2= +3 ? p-s
Слайд 25

Application of the steps … Step 1-2 -1 -2 -1

Application of the steps …

Step 1-2

-1

-2

-1

-2

+4

+5

X0

mw

p-w

p-s

x2

x1

x3

x4

x5

x6

p-w

arc (x0-x2)= 4 -1-2 + 5

-1-2= +3 ? p-s

MW

pw

Branch T26

Слайд 26

Final Pit Limit Mine all the nodes connected to a strong arc. G(X, A) = 3

Final Pit Limit

Mine all the nodes connected to a strong arc.

G(X, A) = 3
Слайд 27

Optimal Pit The L-G algorithm will flag each block as

Optimal Pit

The L-G algorithm will flag each block as being

inside or outside the optimal pit outline
In the 3D algorithm, the optimal pit will be the pit with the highest net value
Revenue can be calculated from ore tonnages, grades, recoveries and product price.
Price is often the biggest unknown but, in order to design a pit, you must assume some price
Слайд 28

Varying Slope Angles It is possible to have different slope

Varying Slope Angles

It is possible to have different slope angles

in different areas of the pit (different levels or different X, Y coordinates)
Results in an irregular pit wall (complete blocks being removed)
Bulges in the pit can lead to geotechnical concerns
Must be corrected before the pit is complete
Слайд 29

3. Fundamental Tree Algorithm Long-term production scheduling consists of determining

3. Fundamental Tree Algorithm

Long-term production scheduling consists of determining an optimal

sequence of extracting the mineralized material from the ground annualy.
MIP models are used to solve the problem for an open pit mine.
Assume that ultimate pit and pushbacks are given already.
Even optimizing the production schedule on a pushback using MIP can be too complex (too many blocks).
Слайд 30

The Approach To simplify the MIP we would like to

The Approach

To simplify the MIP we would like to decrease the

number of blocks in our model so that the MIP model can be solved efficiently.
This is done by combining blocks that should be mined together as just one block.
We call the combined block a fundamental tree.
Слайд 31

The Approach A Fundamental Tree is defined as a combination

The Approach

A Fundamental Tree is defined as a combination of blocks

such that:
The blocks can be profitably mined.
The blocks obey the slope constraints.
There is no proper subset of the chosen blocks that meets 1 and 2.
Слайд 32

3.1. Fundamental Tree Algorithm

3.1. Fundamental Tree Algorithm

Слайд 33

Step 1 - Generate a Starting Network Given a our

Step 1 - Generate a Starting Network

Given a our pushback block

model represent blocks by nodes of a graph.
Arcs go from positive blocks to overlying negative blocks that must be removed before based on slope constraints.
We will use a network flow to find the fundamental trees.
To construct a network flow, we add a source node s and a sink node t.
Слайд 34

Example of Generating a Starting Network Example 2-D block model,

Example of Generating a Starting Network

Example 2-D block model, shows the

node numbers and the block economic values in $/t

Network representation of the 2D block model, a source node s and a sink node t are added.

Слайд 35

Step 2 - Find the Cone Value The "cone" value

Step 2 - Find the Cone Value

The "cone" value of a

block (CVi) is the sum of the block values of itself and all overlying blocks
We calculate the cone value of all positive nodes in our pushback (or pit), CVi

Example of step 2
CV6 = V6+V1+V2+V3
=+6 — 1 — 2 — 2 = +1
CV7 = —3,
CV8 = —2

Слайд 36

Step 3 – Assign cofficients to the Positive Nodes Each

Step 3 – Assign cofficients to the Positive Nodes

Each positive node

will be assigned a cofficient, Ci which denotes the rank of node i.
Assign Ci to the nodes by ordering mining level firstly, then by cone value.
The maximum value on the top most level will be given size 1 for the highest cone, and the second highest cone value is 2 …
With tie condition, Cis are choosen randomly
Слайд 37

Example CV6 = +1; CV7 = —3; CV8 = —2

Example

CV6 = +1; CV7 = —3; CV8 = —2
Coefficients Ci

are assigned to positive value nodes according to CVi value and the levels where nodes are located.
Since CV6 > C8 > CV7, we assign
CV6 = 1
CV8 = 2
CV7 = 3
Слайд 38

Step 4 - Set up the LP Set up a

Step 4 - Set up the LP

Set up a Linear Program

to find the first iteration of Fundamental Trees.
The LP model can be solved using a commercially availble software such as CPLEX
Слайд 39

Step 5 - Check if we are done If the

Step 5 - Check if we are done

If the number of

Fundamental Trees found is the same as the number of trees obtained from previous solution, go to Step 7.
Otherwise, go to Step 6 to reformulate the problem as a network flow and repeat. We do this by deleting arc with no flow from our network and resolving the new LP (go back Step 2).
Слайд 40

3.2. Formulating the Linear Program * The objective function: Ci

3.2. Formulating the Linear Program * The objective function:
Ci is

the coefficient for node (block) i,
fi, j is the flow from block i to block j.
* The Flow Constraints:
fs, i < Vi ∀i where Vi > 0.
fj, t = -Vj +ξ
Слайд 41

Example of Step 4

Example of Step 4

Слайд 42

Example of Step 4 The network representation of the initial

Example of Step 4

The network representation of the initial solution containing

two trees surrounded by dashed lines.
Слайд 43

Example of Step 4 The network representation the solution containing three trees surrounded by dashed lines.

Example of Step 4

The network representation the solution containing three trees

surrounded by dashed lines.
Слайд 44

3.3. Properties of the fundamental trees Property 1 - All

3.3. Properties of the fundamental trees

Property 1 - All fundamental

trees have positive value is satisfied since:
and
Therefore,
The sum of all positive value nodes in a tree is greater than the sum of negative value nodes.
Слайд 45

Property 2 of the fundamental trees All fundamental trees obey

Property 2 of the fundamental trees

All fundamental trees obey the

slope constraints if they are removed one at a time respecting the sequencing between them.
All overlying negative nodes must be supported by positive nodes by the LP constraints.
Слайд 46

Property 3 of the fundamental trees A tree found by

Property 3 of the fundamental trees

A tree found by FTcannot

contain a subset of a fundamental tree that also can be a fundamental tree.
Base on the objective function,
Where i nodes are positive and j nodes are negative, if a smaller fundamental tree existed then our LP would have found it.
Слайд 47

3.4. Optimization of annual production scheduling using fundamental trees The

3.4. Optimization of annual production scheduling using fundamental trees

The optimization

model is maximization of the NPV, or discounted economic value, to be generated from the mining operation
For scheduling N Fundamental Trees over Y years, the objective function can be expressed as:
Слайд 48

using fundamental trees Where: DEVpi discounted economic value to be

using fundamental trees

Where:
DEVpi discounted economic value to be feberated from

mining and processing all the ore tons in year, p from FTi, DEVpi = DEV0i*DFp (DFp = 1/(1.0 + d)p
DWCip discounted average cost of mining one ton waste from FTi in year p, DWCip = DWCi0*DFp
Wip is a linear variable representing the tons of the waste to be mined at period p from fundamental tree i
Oip is a binary variable, equal to 1 if the ore ton in FTi is scheduling for period p, 0 otherwise.
Слайд 49

Subject to: ❶. Slope constraints: If j is the index

Subject to: ❶. Slope constraints:

If j is the

index for the fundamental trees that have to be removed before being able to remove tree i in a period p:
If Ni is the number of overlying FTs for FT i:
Слайд 50

❷. Sequencing of mining ore and waste If mining the

❷. Sequencing of mining ore and waste

If mining the

ore tonnages from a given FT, all the waste tonnages must be mined out in that FT.
Where:
- TWi is the total tons of waste material within tree i
Слайд 51

❸. Grade blending constraints Upper bound constraints: The average grade

❸. Grade blending constraints

Upper bound constraints: The average grade of

the material sent to the mill has to be less than or equal to a certain grade value, Gmax, for each period, p
Lower bound constraints: The average grade of the material sent to the mill has to be greater than or equal to a certain value, Gmin, for each period, p
Where Gi is the average grade of FTi
TOi is the ore tonnage in FTi
Слайд 52

❹. Processing capacity constraints Upper bound: The total tonnage of

❹. Processing capacity constraints

Upper bound: The total tonnage of ore

processed cannot be more than the processing capacity (PCmax) in any period, p
Lower bound: The total tonnage of ore processed cannot be less than a certain amount (PCmin) in any period, p
Слайд 53

❻. The limit on the stripping ratio in each period

❻. The limit on the stripping ratio in each period
Where
SRmax

is the maximum stripping ratio allowed during any year

❺. Reserve constraints

Слайд 54

❼. Mining capacity The total amount of material mined during

❼. Mining capacity

The total amount of material mined during a year

cannot be more than the total available equipment capacity (MCap) for each period, p
Where: Wip is the tonnage of waste material in FTi
❽ In some mining operation, the total tonnage of waste to be stripped out in a previod is not exceed a waste stripping amount (WCmax). For n-FTs and a given period, p,
Слайд 55

3.5. Case Study: MIP Scheduling Formulation One of the case

3.5. Case Study: MIP Scheduling Formulation

One of the case studies is

performed on a large copper mine in Southern Peru containing 1 million blocks
MIP formulations for mine scheduling treating fundamental trees as single blocks.
This algorithm reduced the number of blocks from 38457 to 5512 fundamental trees.
Therefore, large open pit production scheduling can be optimized by MIP modelling for any objective such as maximizing NPV of a given mine project, or to solve hard ore quality and grade blending problems
Слайд 56

ASSIGNMENT 8 Consider the above 2D orebody model: 1. Show

ASSIGNMENT 8

Consider the above 2D orebody model:
1. Show steps to

determine the ultimate pit limits using:
a) Cone mining algorithm (if known)
b) LG algorithm (Dynamic Programming) (if known)
c) LG algorithm (Graph closure)
Describe the differences between the algorithms.
2. Write codes in C++ to solve the above problem using Graph closure (LG)
Имя файла: Solving-ultimate-pit-limit-problem-through-graph-closure-(L-G-algorithm)-and-the-fundamental-tree-algorithm.pptx
Количество просмотров: 15
Количество скачиваний: 0