Snyder & Allen M. Omoto
Presented by: Leslie Wheeler & Megan Blazek
Презентация на тему The Relationship Closeness Inventory
Содержание
- 1. The Relationship Closeness Inventory
- 2. Key Operational DefinitionsFrequency: Number of hours and minutes
- 3. SubjectsUndergraduate students from University of Minnesota.Ages: 18-49Berscheid, E.,
- 4. GoalTo develop a test of interpersonal closeness using
- 5. MethodAsk students to identify the person with whom
- 6. ResultsTest-Retest: Paired t-tests showed no significant differences between
- 7. Results Cont.Satisfactory reliability and validityA correlation of scores between partners were shown, but not extremely high.
- 8. ConclusionsCloseness is thought to be a major part
- 9. Sample QuestionsIdentification of personWork: Which of the following
- 10. Sample Questions Cont.DiversityIN the past week, I did
- 11. The End Thanks!Leslie Wheeler&Megan Blazek
- 12. Скачать презентацию
- 13. Похожие презентации
Слайды и текст этой презентации
Слайд 1
The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships
Ellen Berscheid, Mark
Слайд 2
Key Operational Definitions
Frequency: Number of hours and minutes spent alone with another
person during waking hours (range: 0-1,200 min.)
Diversity: Number of activities from a list of 38 that the pair spends together.
Strength: The amount of impact (little to very much) one person has on the other’s plans.
Diversity: Number of activities from a list of 38 that the pair spends together.
Strength: The amount of impact (little to very much) one person has on the other’s plans.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 3
Subjects
Undergraduate students from University of Minnesota.
Ages: 18-49
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto,
A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Mean age: 19.38
Modal participants: 19-20 year-old full-time student who is single.
Слайд 4
Goal
To develop a test of interpersonal closeness using operational definitions that can
be assessed by self-report.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 5
Method
Ask students to identify the person with whom they consider them closest.
Using
questionnaires determine closeness according to frequency, diversity, and strength.
Take individual scores and create an overall index of interpersonal closeness.
Sum scores and weigh each subscale equally on a 10-point metric.
Take individual scores and create an overall index of interpersonal closeness.
Sum scores and weigh each subscale equally on a 10-point metric.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 6
Results
Test-Retest: Paired t-tests showed no significant differences between test 1 and test
2.
Romantic relationships were closer than friends or family.
No sex differences
Negative correlation between longevity and closeness
Highly significant differences between close relationships and not close relationships
Romantic relationships were closer than friends or family.
No sex differences
Negative correlation between longevity and closeness
Highly significant differences between close relationships and not close relationships
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. & Omoto, A.M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57I5), 792-807.
Слайд 7
Results Cont.
Satisfactory reliability and validity
A correlation of scores between partners were shown,
but not extremely high.
Слайд 8
Conclusions
Closeness is thought to be a major part of relationships and can
predict certain behavior.
This test provides information that spans different types of relationships.
The RCI should be used in conjunction with other tests, not alone.
This test provides information that spans different types of relationships.
The RCI should be used in conjunction with other tests, not alone.
Слайд 9
Sample Questions
Identification of person
Work: Which of the following best describes your relationship
with this person? (Check only one)__ co-worker __ your boss/supervisor __ your subordinate
Frequency
DURING THE PAST WEEK, what is the average amount of time, per day, that you spent alone with X in the MORNING?
Frequency
DURING THE PAST WEEK, what is the average amount of time, per day, that you spent alone with X in the MORNING?
Слайд 10
Sample Questions Cont.
Diversity
IN the past week, I did the foling activities alone
with X: (Check all that apply)
__ did laundry
__ prepared a meal
__ watched TV
Strength
Using the 7-point scale below, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree by writing the appropriate number in the space corresponding to each item
__ X will influence my future financial security
__ X does not influence everyday things in my life.
__ did laundry
__ prepared a meal
__ watched TV
Strength
Using the 7-point scale below, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree by writing the appropriate number in the space corresponding to each item
__ X will influence my future financial security
__ X does not influence everyday things in my life.
