Risk and Return презентация

Содержание

Слайд 2

Topics Covered Markowitz Portfolio Theory Risk and Return Relationship Testing the CAPM CAPM Alternatives

Topics Covered

Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Risk and Return Relationship
Testing the CAPM
CAPM Alternatives

Слайд 3

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Combining stocks into portfolios can reduce standard

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Combining stocks into portfolios can reduce standard deviation, below

the level obtained from a simple weighted average calculation.
Correlation coefficients make this possible.
The various weighted combinations of stocks that create this standard deviations constitute the set of efficient portfolios.
Слайд 4

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Price changes vs. Normal distribution Microsoft -

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Price changes vs. Normal distribution
Microsoft - Daily % change

1990-2001

Proportion of Days

Daily % Change

Слайд 5

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return Investment A % probability % return

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return
Investment A

% probability

% return

Слайд 6

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return Investment B % probability % return

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return
Investment B

% probability

% return

Слайд 7

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return Investment C % probability % return

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return
Investment C

% probability

% return

Слайд 8

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return Investment D % probability % return

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return
Investment D

% probability

% return

Слайд 9

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Coca Cola Reebok Standard Deviation Expected Return

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Coca Cola

Reebok

Standard Deviation

Expected Return (%)

35% in Reebok

Expected Returns

and Standard Deviations vary given different weighted combinations of the stocks
Слайд 10

Efficient Frontier Standard Deviation Expected Return (%) Each half egg

Efficient Frontier

Standard Deviation

Expected Return (%)

Each half egg shell represents the possible

weighted combinations for two stocks.
The composite of all stock sets constitutes the efficient frontier
Слайд 11

Efficient Frontier Standard Deviation Expected Return (%) Lending or Borrowing

Efficient Frontier

Standard Deviation

Expected Return (%)

Lending or Borrowing at the risk free

rate (rf) allows us to exist outside the efficient frontier.

rf

Lending Borrowing

T

S

Слайд 12

Efficient Frontier Example Correlation Coefficient = .4 Stocks σ %

Efficient Frontier

Example Correlation Coefficient = .4
Stocks σ % of Portfolio Avg Return
ABC Corp 28 60% 15%
Big

Corp 42 40% 21%
Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 33.6
Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 28.1
Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 17.4%
Слайд 13

Efficient Frontier Example Correlation Coefficient = .4 Stocks σ %

Efficient Frontier

Example Correlation Coefficient = .4
Stocks σ % of Portfolio Avg Return
ABC Corp 28 60% 15%
Big

Corp 42 40% 21%
Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 33.6
Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 28.1
Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 17.4%
Let’s Add stock New Corp to the portfolio
Слайд 14

Efficient Frontier Example Correlation Coefficient = .3 Stocks σ %

Efficient Frontier

Example Correlation Coefficient = .3
Stocks σ % of Portfolio Avg Return
Portfolio 28.1 50% 17.4%
New Corp 30

50% 19%
NEW Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 31.80
NEW Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 23.43
NEW Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 18.20%
Слайд 15

Efficient Frontier Example Correlation Coefficient = .3 Stocks σ %

Efficient Frontier

Example Correlation Coefficient = .3
Stocks σ % of Portfolio Avg Return
Portfolio 28.1 50% 17.4%
New Corp 30

50% 19%
NEW Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 31.80
NEW Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 23.43
NEW Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 18.20%
NOTE: Higher return & Lower risk
How did we do that? DIVERSIFICATION
Слайд 16

Efficient Frontier A B Return Risk (measured as σ)

Efficient Frontier

A

B

Return

Risk (measured as σ)

Слайд 17

Efficient Frontier A B Return Risk AB

Efficient Frontier

A

B

Return

Risk

AB

Слайд 18

Efficient Frontier A B N Return Risk AB

Efficient Frontier

A

B

N

Return

Risk

AB

Слайд 19

Efficient Frontier A B N Return Risk AB ABN

Efficient Frontier

A

B

N

Return

Risk

AB

ABN

Слайд 20

Efficient Frontier A B N Return Risk AB Goal is

Efficient Frontier

A

B

N

Return

Risk

AB

Goal is to move up and left.
WHY?

ABN

Слайд 21

Efficient Frontier Return Risk Low Risk High Return High Risk

Efficient Frontier

Return

Risk

Low Risk
High Return

High Risk
High Return

Low Risk
Low Return

High Risk
Low Return

Слайд 22

Efficient Frontier Return Risk Low Risk High Return High Risk

Efficient Frontier

Return

Risk

Low Risk
High Return

High Risk
High Return

Low Risk
Low Return

High Risk
Low Return

Слайд 23

Efficient Frontier Return Risk A B N AB ABN

Efficient Frontier

Return

Risk

A

B

N

AB

ABN

Слайд 24

Security Market Line Return Risk . rf Risk Free Return = Efficient Portfolio

Security Market Line

Return

Risk

.

rf

Risk Free
Return =

Efficient Portfolio

Слайд 25

Security Market Line Return . rf Risk Free Return = Efficient Portfolio BETA 1.0

Security Market Line

Return

.

rf

Risk Free
Return =

Efficient Portfolio

BETA

1.0

Слайд 26

Security Market Line Return . rf Risk Free Return = BETA Security Market Line (SML)

Security Market Line

Return

.

rf

Risk Free
Return =

BETA

Security Market Line (SML)

Слайд 27

Security Market Line Return BETA rf 1.0 SML SML Equation

Security Market Line

Return

BETA

rf

1.0

SML

SML Equation = rf + B ( rm -

rf )
Слайд 28

Capital Asset Pricing Model R = rf + B ( rm - rf ) CAPM

Capital Asset Pricing Model

R = rf + B ( rm

- rf )

CAPM

Слайд 29

Testing the CAPM Avg Risk Premium 1931-65 Portfolio Beta 1.0

Testing the CAPM

Avg Risk Premium 1931-65

Portfolio Beta

1.0

SML

30
20
10
0

Investors

Market Portfolio

Beta vs. Average Risk

Premium
Слайд 30

Testing the CAPM Avg Risk Premium 1966-91 Portfolio Beta 1.0

Testing the CAPM

Avg Risk Premium 1966-91

Portfolio Beta

1.0

SML

30
20
10
0

Investors

Market Portfolio

Beta vs. Average Risk

Premium
Слайд 31

Testing the CAPM High-minus low book-to-market Return vs. Book-to-Market Dollars Low minus big http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html

Testing the CAPM

High-minus low book-to-market

Return vs. Book-to-Market

Dollars

Low minus big

http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html

Слайд 32

Consumption Betas vs Market Betas Stocks (and other risky assets) Wealth = market portfolio

Consumption Betas vs Market Betas

Stocks
(and other risky assets)

Wealth = market
portfolio

Слайд 33

Arbitrage Pricing Theory Alternative to CAPM Expected Risk Premium =

Arbitrage Pricing Theory

Alternative to CAPM
Expected Risk
Premium = r

- rf
= Bfactor1(rfactor1 - rf) + Bf2(rf2 - rf) + …
Return = a + bfactor1(rfactor1) + bf2(rf2) + …
Имя файла: Risk-and-Return.pptx
Количество просмотров: 222
Количество скачиваний: 0